Passage Workspace

1 Samuel 20:32

A focused desk for reading, commentary, cross-references, original language notes, and your own observations.

Chapter Interlinear Verse Page

1 Samuel 20:32

32 And Jonathan answered Saul his father, and said unto him, Wherefore shall he be slain? what hath he done?

Chapter Context

1 Samuel 20 is a biographical narrative chapter in the Old Testament that explores themes of sacrifice, grace, faith. Written during the transition to monarchy (c. 1050-1010 BCE), this chapter should be understood within its historical context: Israel transitioned from tribal confederacy to monarchy while facing Philistine military pressure.

The chapter can be divided into several sections:

  1. Verses 1-5: Introduction and setting the context
  2. Verses 6-12: Development of key themes
  3. Verses 13-20: Central message and teachings
  4. Verses 21-42: Conclusion and application

This chapter is significant because it foreshadows Christ's work through typology and prophetic elements. When studying this passage, it's important to consider both its immediate context within 1 Samuel and its broader place in the scriptural canon.

Verse Study

1 Samuel 20:32

32 And Jonathan answered Saul his father, and said unto him, Wherefore shall he be slain? what hath he done?

Analysis

And Jonathan answered Saul his father, and said unto him, Wherefore shall he be slain? what hath he done?

Jonathan's courageous response - 'Wherefore shall he be slain? what hath he done?' - directly challenged his father's murderous intent with legal argument. These two questions demand justification: what crime deserves death, and what evidence supports it? Jonathan appealed to justice even against his father's rage. The questions exposed the irrational basis for Saul's hatred - there was no legitimate answer. Sometimes the most powerful defense is simply asking what wrong has been done. Jonathan stood between his father and his friend, demanding righteousness.

Historical Context

Legal proceedings required specific accusations and evidence. Jonathan's questions followed proper judicial form. Challenging a king's death sentence required considerable courage, especially for the heir apparent who might have benefited from David's elimination.

Reflection

  • When have you courageously asked powerful people to justify their harmful intentions?
  • What does Jonathan's willingness to challenge his father teach about the priority of justice over family loyalty?

Cross-References

Original Language

וַיַּ֙עַן֙ H6030 יְה֣וֹנָתָ֔ן H3083 אֶת H853 שָׁא֖וּל H7586 אָבִ֑יו H1 וַיֹּ֧אמֶר H559 אֵלָ֛יו H413 לָ֥מָּה H4100 יוּמַ֖ת H4191 מֶ֥ה H4100 עָשָֽׂה׃ H6213